Engineering lab / Interactive technical portfolio

Synthetic demonstration

Cooling Systems Factory

Explore the operation, follow component lots and inspect the evidence behind each engineering decision.

Meet the engineer

SYN-OPS-01 / Factory overview

factory-1.0 · Synthetic operation

Planning scenarioRequested skids / week

Plan: 8 skids / 54.8 h assumed work. Baseline: 8 skids / 54.8 h.

This tab retains your scenario and demo reviews. Reset factory restores the original state.

All parts, suppliers, measurements and events below are fictional. Built to demonstrate engineering analysis and software design; no employer or customer engagement is implied.

SYN-OPS-01 / Baseline drawing context

Factory floor plan

32 × 20 m / illustrative arrangement

Select area

Circulation / assumed 2 m corridor

Select an area to inspect its function and records. Connections show process sequence; the plan is a teaching assumption, without travel optimization or a safety-code assessment.

Selected area

M1 / Valve machining

Finish the valve-spool diameter and inspect the process against its fixed reference.

Station: SYN-ST-M01
Equipment: SYN-MC-01
Next operation: Kitting K1 after component review

Valve-spool inspection history; 90 individual measurements.

Open SPC / process quality

Inspect M1 in layout

Operator: SYN-021 · Fictional equipment fabricator. Purchased harness supplier: SYN-014. Factory and supplier roles are distinct.

Industrial engineering / baseline

210 loaded m / hypothetical week at 8 skids

Calculated from geometry and loaded trips. The overview drawing retains baseline geometry; quality decisions are independent.

Open layout workbench

Work design / A1 / baseline

Single-task lifting index 1.61

Synthetic workstation calculation. Layout geometry supplies location context; it does not establish reach, capacity or safety approval.

Review workstation

Continuous improvement / M1 / 32 experimental cuts

2 settings pass the study screen

Synthetic loss evidence and a randomized, replicated machining experiment. Draft changes preserve existing quality gates.

Investigate process tradeoffs

Manufacturing ML / M1 / 720 synthetic batches

Logistic regression / 20% inspection threshold

Compare trained models, inspect heldout errors and investigate a changed process. Inspection support; no release approval.

Open ML workbench

Production flow / SYN-FLOW-001 / simulation

1 assembly workers / 1 test stand pairs / 2 waiting slots

Configuration only. Inspect queues, line balance and 20-run simulated outcomes in the workbench; these differ from geometric calculations and quality acceptance evidence.

Open production simulation

Requested output

8 skids

Per hypothetical week; planning input

Standard work content

54.8 h

Assumed work content; not forecast capacity

Illustrative order trace

3 orders

One unit each; subset of the operation

Suspect harness population

750 units

11 failures observed in 80 suspect-lot screens

Baseline: 8 requested skids / 54.8 h assumed work content. Baseline remains 8 skids / 54.8 h.

Component genealogy / Illustrative allocations

Follow an order into its evidence

Work order

Existing FAT unit. Supplier-material disposition and equipment acceptance are separate reviews.

Valve component / SYN-VS25

SYN-304

Measurements 71–90; Limited corrected run; not a completed long-term capability qualification.

Inspect SYN-304 in SPC

Purchased harness / HX-12

SYN-B2 / supplier SYN-014

Received population 350; screening 2/40. Suspect supplier setup window; material disposition requires NCR review.

Inspect SYN-B2 in NCR

Assembly record

SYN-WO-003 / SYN-LC-1000-003

Quantity 1 · current area T1 / Acceptance test

Inspect unit 003 in FAT

Each order illustrates one valve and one harness assignment. These three records are a genealogy subset, not a complete weekly schedule or inventory ledger.

Evidence register

Three independent quality episodes

SYN-RUN-01

32 signal observations / 68 samples

Investigation view; no simulated lot-release authority

Valve-spool inspection history; 90 individual measurements.

SPC-E01 · SPC-E02 · SPC-E03

Open SPC / process quality

SYN-NCR-026

OPEN / containment pending disposition

Supplier-lot review is independent of equipment acceptance

750 suspect supplier units; 11 failures observed in 80 suspect-lot screens.

NCR-E01 · NCR-E02 · NCR-E03 · NCR-E04 · NCR-E05 · NCR-E06

Open NCR / 8D

SYN-FAT-003 Rev A

HOLD / unsigned

Unit SYN-LC-1000-003 only; 4 acceptance blockers

Acceptance record for unit SYN-LC-1000-003 only.

FAT-E01 · FAT-E02 · FAT-E03 · FAT-E04 · FAT-E05 · FAT-E06 · FAT-E07

Open Equipment FAT

Tool-condition drift, supplier under-crimp and the wrong pump impeller have separate causes. A passing FAT does not resolve a supplier-material hold.

Planning comparison / Product structure

Baseline and visitor proposal

A modular liquid-cooling skid uses the component quantities below. Change the planning scenario to compare gross material requirements and assumed work content.

Component / source	Per skid	Baseline / 8 skids	Selected / 8 skids	Change
SYN-VS25 / Valve-spool component Machining cell M1	1 each	8	8	0
HX-12 / Sensor harness Supplier SYN-014	1 set	8	8	0
SYN-PUMP-01 / Pump Purchased; supplier not modeled	2 each	16	16	0
SYN-HX-01 / Heat exchanger Purchased; supplier not modeled	1 each	8	8	0
SYN-FRAME-01 / Skid frame Purchased; supplier not modeled	1 each	8	8	0
Assumed standard work content	6.85 h	54.8 h	54.8 h	0.0 h

Gross requirements exclude stock availability and purchasing lead time. Standard work excludes losses and waiting; it is not a throughput, utilization or staffing estimate.

Process routing, records and metric definitions

Product routing

R1 / Receiving to Q1 / Incoming quality — Purchased harnesses / incoming records
Q1 / Incoming quality to K1 / Kitting — Dispositioned purchased material
M1 / Valve machining to K1 / Kitting — Machined valve components after review
K1 / Kitting to A1 / Skid assembly — Work-order kit
A1 / Skid assembly to T1 / Acceptance test — Configured assembly
T1 / Acceptance test to D1 / Release — Acceptance evidence

Metric dictionary

Requested output / skids / hypothetical week: Visitor planning input. Baseline is 8; not an observed production result.
Gross component requirement / each or sets / hypothetical week: Requested skids × component quantity per skid; excludes inventory netting and purchasing lead time.
Standard work content / hours / hypothetical week: Requested skids × assumed work minutes per unit / 60. Excludes rework, downtime and waiting; not a capacity or staffing forecast.
Illustrative order trace / orders: Three one-unit records illustrating component genealogy; not a complete schedule for the weekly demand.
SPC measured population / observations: 90 sampled measurements from the existing SPC case. Not total production or an inferred lot defect count.
Suspect supplier population / units: 400 in SYN-B1 + 350 in SYN-B2. Distinct from 11 observed sample failures.

Seeded planning history

Seed 26831; repeatable hypothetical demand periods. These periods are independent of the dated sequence inside each quality case.

SYN-P01: 9 skids · SYN-P02: 10 skids · SYN-P03: 8 skids · SYN-P04: 8 skids · SYN-P05: 7 skids · SYN-P06: 7 skids · SYN-P07: 7 skids · SYN-P08: 7 skids

Download factory register Download baseline records

One connected perspective

Physical requirements become data. Data becomes evidence. Evidence informs an operational decision. These demonstrations connect my manufacturing and quality foundation with the systems thinking used in enterprise transformation and product engineering.

Professional context

Explore my documented manufacturing experience, SAP readiness work and data and product development. The synthetic lab is separate from those professional records.

Download technical README